Thursday, December 26, 2019

What is Self-Reliance - 795 Words

Some may ask, what is self-reliance? Self- Reliance is defined as relying on one’s own capabilities, judgment, resources, or independence. In â€Å"Self-Reliance†, written by an American Transcendentalist Ralph Waldo Emerson describes how we should live and prosper as a human being. In order to be self- realigned one must trust themselves, believe in themselves, and create individualism. The search for self-reliance comes from loving something, mainly yourself. Emerson states throughout his essay in order to be an individual you have to trust and be completely honest with yourself. You need to accept who you truly are as a person. Emerson’s self-reliance implies that one must be true to the self, above all others. He states: â€Å"Trust thyself: every heart vibrates to that iron string. This quote states that if you trust yourself, then you can truly be content in whatever you do or wherever you go. Always speak the truth because that is the only way you can be true to yourself. When you trust yourself you live in a state of peace and your heart vibrates like a string on a guitar, making the music pleasing to the ear and the body. In today’s society this quote applies to everyone. Trust is important in relationships, and one must have confidence in themselves and others in life. Emerson was a religious man, so he tells us to trust that God put you here for a reason. He has a plan for everyone. By trusting yourself in you will begin to discover your self-worth. What you think ofShow MoreRelatedWhat Makes A Self Reliance?1691 Words   |  7 PagesWho is an American that embodies self-reliance and independence? Self-reliance, or independence as an individual, is an uniquely American trait. 2 Thessalonians 3:6-14, relating to this value, says to work hard, urge people to work for their own earning, and not be a burden on others. Without self-reliance, America could not be the country it is today. One person who embodies this American value would be Ulysses S. Grant. Grant showed this quality in his hard work to his family and country. He wasRead MoreAutonomy and Self-Reliance: Kant Vs. Emmerson1682 Words   |  7 PagesThe Autonomy of Self-Reliance In the late eighteenth century, with the publication of his theories on morality, Immanuel Kant revolutionized philosophy in a way that greatly impacted the decades of thinkers after him. The result of his influence led to perceptions and interpretations of his ideas reflected in the works of writers all around the world. Kant’s idealism stems from a claim that moral law, a set of innate rules within each individual, gives people the ability to reason, and itRead MoreThe Importance Of Self Reliance By David Thoreau818 Words   |  4 PagesThe Importance of Self Reliance One of the transcendentalist beliefs is that you should rely on yourself. Transcendentalism is a idea that you have to experience and understand nature. It developed in the early 1800’s. It has 5 core beliefs: nonconformity, self reliance, free thought, confidence, and importance of nature. The texts I will use as examples are Excerpts from Walden, and Self-Reliance. The authors of these are Ralph Waldo Emerson, and Henry David Thoreau. Self Reliance helps you surviveRead MoreSelf-Reliance English Essay802 Words   |  4 PagesSelf-Reliance Megan Delgado P.5 Make-up The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines self-reliance as reliance on ones own efforts, and abilities; Personal independence. Synonyms in the thesaurus include aptitude and ability to pertain independence. Yet self-reliance is so much more than its definition or synonyms; It doesnt exactly mean what the word itself states Reliance on oneself. It has a wide variety of interpretation and complexity than any definition provided for youRead MoreRalph Waldo Emersons Theory Of Transcendentalism1406 Words   |  6 PagesWhy fit in when you were born to stand out this quote was written by Dr. Suess and is an example of self reliance. In the transcendentalist era the whole idea of transcendentalism was self reliance, and having relationships with nature and spiritual wealth. For example Emerson wrote an essay called Self-Reliance talking about self reliance and people taking care of themselves instead of trusting other people to help. In the transcendentalist era during the 1800s i n America, people relied on themselvesRead MoreSelf-Reliance636 Words   |  3 PagesSanaya Williams PH-221 Professor Bradley Final Paper- Ralph Waldo Emerson Self-Reliance â€Å"Self- Reliance† is considered one of Ralph Waldo Emerson’s best-known essays. The essay was first published in 1841 in his collection, Essays: First Series. This essay contains the most thorough statement of Emerson’s emphasis on the need for individuals to avoid conformity and false consistency, and instead follow their own instincts and ideas. This essay shows Emerson’s ways for making and translating classicalRead MoreThe Theme of Self-Reliance in Essays by Ralph Waldo Emerson821 Words   |  4 PagesThe Theme of Self-Reliance in Essays by Ralph Waldo Emerson I will, in the following, discuss the theme of self-reliance in the above-mentioned texts. But what exactly is self-reliance? In his 1841 publication called Essays, Ralph Waldo Emerson includes an essay simply entitled Self-Reliance in which he states Trust thyself#8230;Great men have always done so and confided themselves childlike to the genius of their age#8230; . Self-reliance is thus defined as the ability to be your own masterRead MoreWakefulness: Thoreau, Whitman, and Emerson1532 Words   |  7 Pagesintellectual exertion throughout everyday life is essential to becoming self-reliant, creating a more intellectual and better community, and becoming closer to god. Being self-reliant is brought up in many of Thoreau, Emerson, and Whitman’s work and if one wants to understand the idea of Wakefulness, then they need to understand self-reliance. In his book, Walden, Thoreau writes about the idea that in order to be awake, one must be self-reliant. In Walden, Thoreau leaves his life in Concord, MassachusettsRead MoreTranscendentalism : Ralph Waldo Emerson And Henry David Thoreau967 Words   |  4 Pagesthis quote, â€Å"People... have knowledge about themselves and the world around them that transcends... what they can see, hear, taste, touch or feel†(History). This is a perfect explanation for what a transcendentalist is and what makes them so special. There are several important transcendentalist ideas that were expressed by Emerson and Thoreau, but few are as necessary as these; nature, self-reliance, and life quality. Nature is one of the most essential transcendentalist ideas that Emerson and ThoreauRead MoreEmerson Individualism Essay1222 Words   |  5 PagesEmerson begins his major work on individualism by declaring the importance of thinking for oneself instead of humbly acquiring someone else’s belief. Emerson says, â€Å"To believe that what is true in your private heart is true for all men — that is genius†. The one who scorns personal intuition and, instead, chooses to admit others opinions lacks the inventive power necessary for strong, fearless individualism. Emerson says, â€Å"Trust thyself,† a saying that ties along this initial section of the essay

Wednesday, December 18, 2019

A Summary On Socrates s Apology - 1332 Words

Lucas Barbosa 140108290 Dr. Shelly Beal BF299-BR3-BR4 23 March 2016 Socrates’s Attentive Apology The fight to do what is right is not an easy path to traverse, but is one which demands a noble and enduring character. Defending principles of justice with logic and reason in the face of political opposition, is a difficult task to take, but the elusive Socrates boldly undertook this endeavor. In Plato’s Apology, he recalls the daring defence of the principles of truth that Socrates took against all odds. Plato’s recollections, much like the trial of Socrates at the time, has sparked numerous debates amongst scholars who seek to understand the events of the trial more deeply. One such debate has centered on what Socrates meant when he said his speech was nothing more than words spoken at random. Brumbaugh and Oldfather, in their scholarly analysis, contend that Socrates’s speech is riddled with fine polish and organization suggesting that his speech was not random. As will be discussed, there are several examples of organization in Socrates’s speech such as when he provides his jurors with an outline of his speech. Additionally, masterfully woven throughout his defence, Socrates employed many diverse modes of argumentation in a logical and consistent manner lending credence to the notion that he planned his speech beforehand. This skillful use of these modes in Socrates’s argument, all vindicate an intentional design and premeditation. Despite Socrates’s humble assertionsShow MoreRelatedPlatos Apology, Summary, Main Characters750 Words   |  3 PagesSocrates - The protagonist of The Apology, as well as all of Plato s other dialogues. Socrates seems to be a very simple man, not having many material possessions and speaking in a plain, conversational manner. However, this seeming plainness is all a part of the ironic characteristic of Socrates method. Professing his own ignorance, he engages in conversation with someone claiming to be an expert, usually in ethical matters. By asking simple questions, Socrates gradual ly reveals that his interlocutorRead MoreWhat Are The Charges Against Socrates?1019 Words   |  5 Pages2015 What are the charges against Socrates as recorded in the Apology. Is he guilty of them? Why or why not? The Apology is assumed to be the most realistic account that has been conserved of Socrates defense of himself as it was presented before the Athenian Council. It is in essential agreement with the references to the trial that occur in Plato s other dialogs. We may determine that Apology is not written by Socrates and only contains the words of Socrates that were memorized by Plato, sinceRead MoreThe History of the Death Penalty Essay2059 Words   |  9 Pagesis most controversial in modern time and throughout our history; which is is the ethical decision of a death penalty. This controversial issue of punishment by death has been going on for centuries. It dates back to as early as 399 B.C.E., to when Socrates was forced to drink hemlock for his â€Å"corruption of the youth† and â€Å"impiety†. A brief history of the death penalty is in order so that one can be aware of this laws nature since that is how one would start to understand how it can be appliedRead MoreParmenides and Heraclitus5510 Words   |  23 Pagesboth the actual order of the universe as well as the means of our ability to understand it.    Abstract Socrates views are analyzed by studying a conversation between Socrates, Cephalus, his son Polemarchus and his followers. The author explains how Socrates enters into a philosophical dialogue with several different individuals who attempt to set down a firm definition of justice. Socrates then sets out to test and challenge their definitions through his method of questioning and counter-examplesRead MoreTracer Study19735 Words   |  79 Pagesnewly-qualified teachers were not able to secure teaching posts because provinces could not afford them (Hofrneyr Hall, 1995:30). Eight percent of teacher graduates were unemployed, while four percent were employed in the private sector or engaged in fulltime s~dy. For those graduates who found employment as teachers, the teaching contexts varied. Former African schools tended to employ graduates as permanent full-time staff: while former Indian schools tended to employ graduates as full-time temporaryRead MoreTop 1 Cause for Project Failure65023 Words   |  261 PagesFeatured discussion In your experience, what is the TOP #1 cause for Project failure? From experience, the following are the TOP10 causes of Project failure that Mathew can think of (they are not in any kind of order): #1. Lacking Sponsor s Involvement/Ownership #2. Halo Effect (Wrong Man for the Job) #3. Poor HR Management #4. Poor/Inadequate Project Communications #5. Ignoring Project Stakeholders #6. Absence of Risk Management #7. Scope Creep/Unrealistic Expectations ( scope creep:Read MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 Pagesconcentrates on these three uses: we use language to describe a situation, to explain why an event occurred, and to argue that our conclusion should be believed. But it can be difficult to distinguish these three uses from each other. Here is a quick summary of the differences among the three: Sub-conclusion. This sub-conclusion is a basic premise for the final conclusion that all the patients given the AIDS antidote now have red hair. 27 58 †¢A description says that its like that. †¢An explanation

Monday, December 9, 2019

Charles De Secondat, Baron De La Brede Et De Montesquieu Was Born In 1 Essay Example For Students

Charles De Secondat, Baron De La Brede Et De Montesquieu Was Born In 1 Essay 689 to a French noble family. His family tree could be traced 350 years, which in his view made its name neither good nor bad. (The Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, p. 68) Montesquieus views started to be shaped at a very early age. A beggar was chosen to be his godfather to remind him of his obligations to the poor. Montesquieus education started at the age of 11 when he was sent to Juilly, a school maintained by the Congregation of the Oratory. From 1705 to 1709 he studied law in Bordeaux. From 1705 to 1709 he was a legal apprentice in Paris. There he came to know some of the most advanced thinkers of his time: Fredet, the Abbe Lama, and Boulainvilliers.(Ibid.). In 1716 Montesquieu got a seat of president a mortier in the parlement of Guyenne from his deceased uncle. Even though he did not like his job he believed parliaments were necessary to control the monarchs. In 1721 Montesquieu published the Persian Letters, which he began working on while studying in Bordeaux. The book was a success. In the Persian Letters Montesquieu showed how relative all of the French values were. Even though the technique used in this witty book was previously used by other writers, Montesquieu did a great job making fun of the European values. At that time he already believed in the immorality of European practices such as religious prosecution. The book gave roots for Montesquieus later arguments and ideas. When in 1728 Montesquieu, with the help of his Parisian connections he got elected to the French Academy, he was happy to sell his office of president a mortier. In the course of the next three years he traveled all over Europe, visiting Germany, Hungary, England, Holland, Austria, and Italy. It is not surprising that out of his European tour the country which had the greatest impact on his later work (just like it did on Voltaires) was England. During his stay there he was elected a fellow of the Royal Society. After he returned to France the second portion of his carrier had began. He became a full time writer, traveling between his La Brede estate and Paris. It is during this period that the Considerations on the Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and Their Decline and the Spirit of Laws were written. In the Considerations Montesquieu used Roman history to prove some of his ideas about reasons for the rise and the fall of civilizations. His most important point was that history is made by causes and effects, by events influenced by man, and not by luck. His ideas are summarized in this passage:I is not fortune that rules the world . . .The Romans had a series of consecutive successes when their government followed one policy, and an unbroken set of reverses when it adopted another. There are general causes, whether moral or physical, which act upon every monarchy, which create, maintain, or ruin it. All accidents are subject to these causes, and if the chance loss of a battle, that is to say, a particular cause, ruins a state, there is a general cause that created the situation whereby this state could perish by the loss of a single battle. (1734, chapter 18)Montesquieu disliked democracy. In the Considerations he argued that in a democratic society conflicts were essential becaus e various groups would argue for their own interest. He believed that the division of the Roman empire was caused by two many freedoms. On the other hand he also opposed a system where social classes oppress other classes without resistance. .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1 , .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1 .postImageUrl , .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1 , .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1:hover , .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1:visited , .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1:active { border:0!important; } .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1:active , .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1 .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ufcea16578fd79291b05d05716fb992f1:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Argumentative Essay About TechnologyAfter 20 years of work Montesquieu published his most complete book, The Spirit of Laws. In this comparison of different government types, Montesquieu used his views on human nature to explain human actions and passions and predict the most effective government. According to his ideas human passions such as hunger for power, jealousy, and hate made men seek absolute rule, and passions like want of freedom, and hate of oppression lead the suppressed classes to over though the government. In the Spirit of Laws Montesquieu tries to develop an effective government that will keep the country united. It is impossible to describe this book in t his report by I will state a few main points. Montesquieu believed that the most effective and modern type of government is a monarchy. By monarchy he meant a ruler governing the nation, with the nobility, the clergy and parliament controlling his actions. He believed the weak should be protected from the powerful by laws and a separation of powers. He felt that the nobility and an monarch had to both be present and could not succeed one without the other. Montesquieu stated that it was important to understand that even members of one class are not exactly alike, but are somewhat alike. In the Spirit of Laws he reefers to the importance of teaching citizens why laws are a certain way and why they are necessary. Montesquieu believed religion was aslo helpfull to control a country. He made it a tool used by the rulers to keep the citizens loyal. In general, in the Spirit of Laws, Montesquieus model governments did not exactly duplicate any existing ones. On the other hand they were the guidelines for the governments of his day, as well as ones of our time. His ideas help us to understand the Enlightenment, as well as the Middle Ages. It is safe to say that his ideas will never die and his gift to the world will always be remembered. Montesquieu can easily be considered a model Enlightment figure. His ideas produce a mild paradox. He wanted change for the better without crushing the current government. He wanted to educate the people of a country, but was not a radical, and therefore didnt include the peasants. He respected reason, and used it to help the mankind by creating an idle society. He critisised religion, and yet had faith in God. As a whole he tried to improve things without turning the world upside down. He was the model figure for the steady advancement of the human civilization. BIBLIOGRAPHY1. Hollier, Denis , A New History of French Literature, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1989. 2. The Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, p. 467-476. 3. Loy, John Robert, Montesquieu, New York, Twayne Publishers, 1968. 4. A History of World Societies volume II, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, p. 669-679. 5. Robert Shedlock, Lessons on World History, 1980, p. 38a-38c.

Monday, December 2, 2019

Crucible Essay What is the dramatic significance of Act 2 Essay Example

Crucible Essay What is the dramatic significance of Act 2 Essay Consider the effects of character and action; the effect of dramatic devices; the layers of meaning in language, ideas themes; the historical context. Act two begins in the common room of The Proctors household. It has been eight days since Abigail and the girls made their accusations against the innocent people within the community of Salem. At the beginning of the scene the common room is empty and the only thing that can be heard is the voice of Elizabeth Proctor softly singing to her children. John soon arrives and as Elizabeth enters the common room the couple engage in a conversation of small talk that appears so painful it suggests tension. It appears that John has done wrong, as he is constantly trying to please her, and yet she seems most unimpressed. The scene progresses as the two sit down for dinner. Their servant, Mary Warren has defied the orders of John and Elizabeth by going to the courts in Salem. Elizabeth informs John that there have been fourteen arrests, she also tells him that the court have the power to hang the accused and that the Deputy Governor promises that people will be hung if they do not confess. We will write a custom essay sample on Crucible Essay What is the dramatic significance of Act 2 specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Crucible Essay What is the dramatic significance of Act 2 specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Crucible Essay What is the dramatic significance of Act 2 specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer John is bewildered by the arrests but reassures Elizabeth that Abigail swore her dancing had nothing to do with witchcraft. Elizabeth wants him to give this statement in court, but he protests that he cannot as Abigail told him this information while they were alone together. On hearing this Elizabeths faith in John is totally demolished, as he had previously told her that Abigail had sworn this with a crowd. John demands that Elizabeth stop judging him, he says that he feels like his home is a courtroom. Elizabeth replies that the real court is in his own heart. At this point John proctors attention is drawn to a noise outside he decides to investigate, as he goes to the door Mary Warren enters, he goes immediately to her and unleashing his anger he grabs her and shakes her violently. He harshly questions her demanding to know why she defied his orders, and left his wife on her own. As if to compensate Mary presents Elizabeth with a doll that she made for her in court. She tells John that there have now been thirty nine arrests, she also reveals that Goody Osburn will hang and that Sarah Good will not as she confessed to making a compact with Lucifer. As John hears this news his guilt (shown by anger) grows, he argues with Mary over whether or not she can return to the witch trials. John inevitably uses violence to try and win his case, and so in defence Mary reveals that she saved the life of Elizabeth earlier that day as her name was brought up in the court. The fact that Elizabeths was mentioned brings Reverend Hale to the Proctors household. He notes several things, for one that their youngest son is not baptized and two, their relationship with Reverend Parris is not one of a positive nature. He also asks them to recite the Ten Commandments. John gives the first nine, and then stumbles ironically on adultery. At this point the stage direction that describes John reads as though a secret arrow had pained his heart, showing the guilt and shame that John Proctor feels as his wife has to remind him of the last commandment. While being questioned by Hale, Giles Corey and Francis Nurse rush into The Proctors home, with news that their wives have been arrested. Soon after, Ezekiel Cheever and Herrick arrive at The Proctors home with a warrant for Elizabeths Arrest. Hale is shocked as, last he heard Elizabeth had not been charged at all. Ezekiel Cheever asks Elizabeth if she has ever kept any dolls, Elizabeth replies that she has not kept a doll since she was a little girl, but Ezekiel sees the doll made my Mary and finds a needle inside it. He immediately relates that Abigail had a fit at dinner that evening and Parris found a needle stabbed into her stomach. He also recalls that Abigail had accused Elizabeth of witchcraft. Elizabeth calls Mary downstairs to tell Ezekiel that it was her that made the doll, but despite Marys statement that she made the doll and Abigail saw her do it, Elizabeth is taken away. Angry Proctor demands that Mary testify against Abigail in court. Mary, who is petrified by Abigail and the power she has over the community, screams that she cannot. Act two plays a vital role within The Crucible by Arthur Miller. As Act two begins we are introduced to the Proctors, as principal characters. John Proctor has appeared in the previous Act, but his wife Elizabeth, though previously described by Abigail, we have never met. However when we do meet her we immediately see a harsh contrast between the Elizabeth earlier described and the Elizabeth now being shown to us. This is important as it allows us to see, Abigails for what she really is. In Act one Abigail describes Goody Proctor as a cold snivelling woman. Also as a liar, she is blackening my name in the village! She is telling lies about me! Implying that Elizabeth is an untrustworthy gossip, and a jealous, spiteful woman. But when she is introduced in Act two she is heard singing softly to her children, Elizabeth is heard singing softly to her children. This tells us that Elizabeth is in fact a warm and loving person. From these quotes we begin to learn about the characters of the two women, we begin to see Elizabeth as a victim and Abigail as a liar, it is also apparent that Abigail feels a strong passion of hate towards Elizabeth. In Act two we see that this hate has arisen from jealousy. An affair, between Abigail and John spirals and escalates into the hysteria of witchcraft. Act two allows us to see the way the affair has affected the lives of the Proctors. Though they both love each other greatly the affair has caused awkwardness between them. As they eat their dinner John tells Elizabeth that he will buy George Jacobs Heifer to make her happy, he then remarks with a grin as indicated by the stage directions, I mean to please you, Elizabeth. The next line belongs to Elizabeth and it reads; I know it, John. It is hard to say is the stage direction that follows this line, and is evidence of the awkwardness that overshadows their relationship. John, experiencing guilt is desperately trying to gain back the trust of Elizabeth. He is constantly aware of her increasing loss of faith in him. Though she denies this loss of faith when confronted, her tone of speech suggests otherwise, and she later admits to keeping a cold house It were a cold house I kept, meaning that she had made sure the house in which they lived was rid of any form of human warmth or emotion. Johns constant need for forgiveness is what later plays a part to his eventual confession of his adultery.